Even then, in my Blue Pill delusions, I saw a contradiction. The first time I was told, “You don’t respect women!” was when I was 19. Our ideas of what defines respect is something we will broadcast because that ideal for Respect is something that’s socially expedient in getting the things we want.
Love, like religion, is usually something we have a personal belief about, but it’s generally something we don’t broadcast to those we don’t love. The same misunderstanding applies to our gendered concepts of Love each sex presumes the other accepts and acknowledges their own ideals about love – men approaching love from outwardly expressed idealism, while women’s is rooted in inwardly (though increasingly outwardly) expressed opportunism.įor the most part this division of approaches to Love is something both sexes hold personally, and unless that person is an artist or a poet the expression of that approach to love is something we reserve for those we come to love. In the last essay i made the case that there are gendered forms of Respect, each with their gendered understanding of what a universal idea of respect should entail. It appears you do NOT play.Respect comes very cheap today. I dunno what the bet limits are (minimum over maximum) - no matter what, you could have made lots of money!!! You could have simply martingaled after every LOSS (L-) - and wiped out all of 'em! Moreover, you could have martingaled after every WIN (W+) in expectation of 2 consecutive W+! You got quite a few win streaks longer than 2. In addition to that, you haven't lost worse than 4 consecutive times. You must have made big bucks, or quids! The bet is close to 50-50, but your system is +.0577 - a 7.7% advantage for you! Something which wouldn't lead to a long-term performance improvement. Would still mean arbitrarily choosing one of two equals over the other, My aim is to createĪ profitable lottery system (and this one may be a candidate - 7 wins = 637, 3 losses 100 = 300, net profit = 337) and changing the sort Limitations of the development environment I chose. Tending towards an average of 150 but it wouldn't correct the underlying Shuffling the items before sorting would result in the predictions Sorts here already without me adding to them." In order to generate a lead-in to the line, "there's enough unstable It would be worth claiming it's called a 'stable sort' even if it wasn't Thank you, I didn't even know it had a name. > haven't looked into what you're actually doing, so this may or may not > you could randomly shuffle the items and then use a stable sort. If you want equal values to be randomly permuted > As a result, because of collisions, over time the predicted sums will > doing a lookup, the spreadsheet matches on the first value of the two. > when it encounters two equal values it doesn't switch them, and when
#FINALE 2014.5 DELETE MEASURE SOFTWARE#
While the spreadsheet software does a sort, > I did a post-mortem on Tuesday's Euromillions result and spotted > the probability of six in a row is 1.5626%Īgain the right side of 127.5, the probability of seven in a row being > Again both sums were the 'right' side of the expected mean of 127.5. > Again both sums were the 'right' side of the expected mean - the > so here are the predicted sums for the weekend: > expected mean, 127.5 (probability of that happening by chance = 25%),
> For what it's worth, both 'predictions' were the correct side of the > Sum of drawn numbers = 112, so that would have been a loser. > their Euromillions odds of 43/20 for 'under 110.5'. > Wednesday sums to 85), but if they did, presumably they would match > They don't offer bets on the Health Lottery (generated combo for > (and this should not be construed as a recommendation) offering odds > A quick appeal to Miss Google found a company called Marathonbet > Euromillions draw sums to 151 (mean of all combos = 127.5). The combo generated by the system for Tuesday's > Should the coincidences continue, there's actually a way to make I've done a small amount of retro-analysis and the current run does seem Yep, I changed the title to something more meaningful.